Follow up to post "Order Granting New Trial Upheld Where Plaintiff’s Counsel Improperly Violates Pre-Trial Orders by Arguing “Reptile Theory," etc."

 

 

This post is a follow-up to our prior post about attorney misconduct in violating a motion in limine preventing improper “reptile theory” and “golden roll“ arguments. (See blogger.com/blog/post/edit/5476224163973754209/4369127834107886388.)we 

 

Unfortunately, it is a frequent occurrence that trial counsel blatantly ignore pretrial rulings as to evidence and, indeed, court rulings in other contexts as well.  In circumstances of such attorney misconduct, it is important to realize there are various provisions that provide for consequences, including, but not limited to, both court-room specific rules and local rules as well as California's state-wide rules.  

 

One such provision is California Rules of Court, Rule 2.30, entitled "Sanctions for rules violations in civil cases."  This rule provides for monetary sanctions and states in full:

 

 

(a) Application

This sanctions rule applies to the rules in the California Rules of Court relating to general civil cases, unlawful detainer cases, probate proceedings, civil proceedings in the appellate division of the superior court, and small claims cases.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2004; adopted effective July 1, 2001.)

(b) Sanctions

In addition to any other sanctions permitted by law, the court may order a person, after written notice and an opportunity to be heard, to pay reasonable monetary sanctions to the court or an aggrieved person, or both, for failure without good cause to comply with the applicable rules. For the purposes of this rule, "person" means a party, a party's attorney, a witness, and an insurer or any other individual or entity whose consent is necessary for the disposition of the case. If a failure to comply with an applicable rule is the responsibility of counsel and not of the party, any penalty must be imposed on counsel and must not adversely affect the party's cause of action or defense thereto.

(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted as untitled subdivision effective January 1, 1985; amended and relettered effective July 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 1994, and January 1, 2004.)

(c) Notice and procedure

Sanctions must not be imposed under this rule except on noticed motion by the party seeking sanctions or on the court's own motion after the court has provided notice and an opportunity to be heard. A party's motion for sanctions must (1) state the applicable rule that has been violated, (2) describe the specific conduct that is alleged to have violated the rule, and (3) identify the attorney, law firm, party, witness, or other person against whom sanctions are sought. The court on its own motion may issue an order to show cause that must (1) state the applicable rule that has been violated, (2) describe the specific conduct that appears to have violated the rule, and (3) direct the attorney, law firm, party, witness, or other person to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against them for violation of the rule.

(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted effective July 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.)

(d) Award of expenses

In addition to the sanctions awardable under (b), the court may order the person who has violated an applicable rule to pay to the party aggrieved by the violation that party's reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, incurred in connection with the motion for sanctions or the order to show cause.

(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007; adopted effective July 1, 2001; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.)

(e) Order

An order imposing sanctions must be in writing and must recite in detail the conduct or circumstances justifying the order.

 

 Follow me on LinkedIn